By Alexandra Christiansen, portfolio manager of Nordea 1 – Global Climate Engagement Fund
If the world is to be successful in transitioning to a sustainable economy, an enormous transformation needs to take place across many industries. New ecosystems are forming and innovative technologies are emerging; however, we are still at the beginning of this green transition. Many businesses have made only the first steps, resulting in significant uncertainty and scepticism as to how and if this transformation will be achieved. This is especially true of today’s heavy emitting industries, which are responsible for a large part of the global pollution problem.
Fifteen years ago Nordea Asset Management (NAM) became a pioneer of environmentally focused investing with our renowned Nordea 1 – Global Climate and Environment Fund – one of Europe’s largest SFDR Article 9 funds, investing in companies that offer innovative climate solutions.
Around the same time, NAM assembled what is now one of the most well established Responsible Investments Teams in Europe, including specialists in climate research and active ownership. Understanding the risks and opportunities arising from the transition to a green economy is an integral part of our fundamental analysis, and we believe that active ownership (including engagement and voting) is an effective tool in driving forward change, holding management teams accountable and alleviating investor scepticism.
Now, NAM is drawing upon the climate and engagement expertise we have developed to work with today’s heavier emitters and environmental polluters as they face an increasingly urgent need to change. This was an important reason behind the launch of Nordea 1 – Global Climate Engagement Fund last year, which focuses on engaging with selected heavy-emitting and environmentally polluting companies in order to drive real change. We call this climate investing 2.0.
The reality is that many of these companies will still be around in the low-carbon economy of the future, and some will play a crucial role in achieving important sustainability goals. Excluding them from portfolios may look good on paper, but will have a limited impact in the real world.
We believe a significant factor in unlocking value in these businesses is convincing the wider market of their improving sustainability and ability to generate positive returns in the future green economy.
This requires these businesses to make commitments with full transparency and backed by science, to which we can hold management teams accountable and measure progress. It also means demonstrating the viability of their sustainability plans in practice, backed by credible capital allocation.
Five engagement themes to lead businesses forward
In order to enact meaningful change through engagement, we focus on five areas. Unsurprisingly, one key consideration is greenhouse gas emissions, which are the leading driver of global warming.
As economic production requires substantial energy inputs, energy management is also paramount for successful climate action.
Water and waste management is another vital issue with the damage from environmental pollution posing risks of legal and regulatory interventions. The world’s limited resources cannot meet growing demand, which creates long-term uncertainty for companies highly dependent on natural assets.
Similarly, companies need a credible plan on natural resource management. This includes using recycled and renewable materials, reducing the use of key supplies, and maximising resource efficiency in manufacturing.
Finally, corporate management teams must be willing to reposition businesses to be resilient to the transition and physical risks of climate change. Through the engagement process, we work with corporate management teams to establish and assess meaningful short and long-term goals, with regular progress reviews. If positive momentum stagnates, we do not hesitate to escalate our engagement efforts.
A critical industry in need of engagement
Responsible for roughly 9% of global emissions, the carbon-intensive steel industry is viewed negatively on ESG criteria – which means companies in this space are unlikely to feature in many sustainability-focused investment strategies. And yet the steel industry is a key structural enabler in the energy transition. As an example, an offshore wind farm or photovoltaic plant can be multiple times more steel-intensive than a conventional coal or gas plant. Even if this were not the case, a material as ubiquitous as steel cannot be ignored in the global decarbonisation drive. Decarbonising the steel making process should be taken very seriously in the context of a global net zero ambition. This is why steel companies can be found in Nordea 1 – Global Climate Engagement Fund.
Making a difference in the real economy
For asset owners who seek to construct a portfolio targeting a lower carbon footprint, there are several approaches. One widely adopted course of action is to divest from high-emitting sectors, which immediately reduces a portfolio’s carbon footprint \ versus the respective index. However, this approach penalises many sectors that are critical for the transition, while minimising the chance of real-world change.
The approach which is best aligned with the real decarbonisation objective of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero is to invest in relative high emitters during the early transition phase. This approach may not result in an immediate positive benefit, but it will lay the foundations for future long-term positive impact in the real economy. Feasibility of engaging is key, in terms of both management teams’ willingness and ability to adapt. This approach intends for investors to avoid emitters that are unable or unwilling to transition. Our engagement efforts are focussed on management teams taking appropriate action to deliver on our expectations. This could be setting adequate targets backed by science, or laying out a credible strategy supported by sufficient capital.
When our engagements bear fruit and the wider market begins to believe and endorse these companies, we turn our attention to new companies with heavy footprints. This is our climate investing 2.0 approach and is how we plan to support real-world impact while seeking to crystallise value for our clients who have entrusted us with their assets.